Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 06:57
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
If you used Pocket to save links, these alternatives will serve you well - Android Police
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Israel warns ‘Tehran will burn’ as Netanyahu hints at regime change - Financial Times
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ray Dalio: ‘We should be afraid of the bond market’ - CNN
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
24 Tech Products You'll Want To Add To Your Routine ASAP - BuzzFeed
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What are the ten cars that make me no longer feel inferior?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
CFPB enforcement lead resigns, slams ‘attack’ on core mission in departure email - CNN
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What is the most interesting question you can ask to get to know someone?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.